Member Login | Click here to make us your homepage More Sites: Regional Sites | Off-West End | Blogs | Ticket Exchange | Search | Feeds

Theatre ownership runs riot

The news that Ambassador Theatre Group, run by Howard Panter and his wife Rosemary Squire, has acquired ownership of Live Nation’s British theatres for £90m is surely a mixed blessing.

In the Times, producer David Pugh declares that power corrupts — and that monopolies tend to dictate mean-minded deals to touring companies — while Benedict Nightingale feebly says that it’s hard to see the acquisition as anything but good news.

But judging by the upkeep in some of its West End theatres, ATG is struggling to maintain a decent service in the theatres it runs at the moment, let alone any future operations.

The Trafalgar Studios is the most uncomfortable auditorium in London, the Duke of York’s is badly run down, the Comedy seriously unwelcoming. And there’s a scandalous one-size-fits-all glass of wine policy at £6.40 a gulp.

The trouble with owning theatres is that each one needs proper care and attention in order to make the outing special to the customer. Box office services are centralised, front of house staff mostly anonymous, bars and loos terrible.

And actually, the idea that Howard and Rosemary have an entirely free hand is a chimera, too. The people who really own the theatres now  are the majority shareholders, Exponent Private Equity, as well as a few property entrepreneurs and — is this a cause for celebration or concern? — the bullish, not notably cultured former director-general of the BBC, Greg Dyke, who is the new executive chairman.

Howard and Rosemary know their theatre, and have their hearts somewhere located in nearly right places, but it is absolutely impossible for them to exercise anything like an independent, flourishing artistic control in these circumstances.

The art of producing plays is the art of attention to detail, long-term commitment to an individual project, fanaticism.

The producing side of ATG depends entirely on the creative concentration of people like Sonia Friedman (who is probably doing far too much to be entirely dedicated to any one project), David Pugh, Kim Posters (who still has a lot to prove) and David Babani, who is as frisky as a puppy but stuck in the past and obsessed with a knackered notion of Broadway.

The Guardian reports that ATG currently spends £3.5m a year on its buildings, a figure that is likely to rise to £8m as it takes on a total of thirty-nine venues around the country and in the West End, where the Apollo Victoria and the Lyceum, the respective homes of Wicked and The Lion King, are the new acquisitions.

It all seems a bit much. If the Cameron Mackintosh group of theatres are the Waitrose of our theatre culture and the Really Useful Group the Sainsbury’s, you can only possibly view ATG as the Tesco’s or Asda of the chain-store monopoly syndrome.

And you remember why Alan Coren liked Tesco’s so much…because it kept the riff raff out of Waitrose. Panter and the Squire need the riff raff to keep the doors revolving. How on earth will they manage the trick of providing great theatre with common denominator qualities?
 

5 Responses to “Theatre ownership runs riot”

  1. RC Says:

    Well said. Couldn’t agree more. ATG theatre are in awful state. I can only state on West End theatres and few regional , but they could all do with drastic refurbishment and care.

    I have to say I am doubtful they will pump any money into the care of these theatres as I don’t actually think the hearts of the company truly lie in the theatre world and its future but for the moment and money. All very well for buisness but these theatres do need care - and I shudder to think now they operate larger venues what drivvel they may bring into them once Wicked and Lion King (ever?) do close. They certainly don’t seem to have the eye exactly on the money when it comes to new productions coming - just overly big marketing as you said.

    I’ve a feeling however, they may sell off some of there venues. I can image this deal has landed them in quite a lot of debt and a case they pursuded it far enough it would have cost them more money if they backed out… I’ve a feeling we could see some more changes come about yet.

    If they were to sell some playhouses - It would be great for Nimax to add theatres to their portfolio. They are starting to care for their theatres more and more and are developing great programmes for their theatres and have always maintained a great box office system and staff handling. Plus the shows they produce do generally work well and seem to have a lot of care and input from the managerment. Sadly, unlike ATG who nobody seems to know who is in charge of what or responsobile for what (was a sonia friedman production, kim poster, howard panter… aren’t they all the same. really?)

    The only comment I would disagree on is that of David Babani. Sometimes you just need a bit of broadway to loven up a season, and I always lookforward to his end of year menier broadway golden age classic followed buy a west end season and then seeing what big names get attached for a broadway run!

  2. RC Says:

    I forgot to all say. If I had my way - the larger houses would have gone to Cameron. As would The Drury Lane and Palladium. Both in a desperate need to be restored to former glory- and with Camerons love for the Lane, we all know he would care for it right down to the light bulbs and cushion plumping!

  3. Mike Hume Says:

    best article I have read in ages. London’s theatreland is owned by the big three, it’s like a Cartel, price fixing. If it were airlines the competition commission would have stepped in.

  4. RC Says:

    I can see it now… Cushion tax on seating …

  5. TBC Says:

    This article is misleading. David Pugh is an independent producer who does not work for ATG. In fact, I don’t think he’s ever even co-produced with them. Kim Poster and David Babani may have co-produced with them but they do not work for ATG either.

Leave a Reply