<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Results: The curveball!</title>
	<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: charlie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9418</link>
		<author>charlie</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 00:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9418</guid>
		<description>If judging only on last Saturday's performances, I'd have Rachel and Ashley in the bottom two. Rachel because with a very 'light and easy' song, she managed to crack at the top note - and no, John, it wasn't because of emotions, it was trying so very hard to impress that she can reach the note. Ashley because I felt those come-hither looks she gave during her performance were shallow. But Ashley survived and it was Sarah who couldn't be saved by Andrew Lloyd Webber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If judging only on last Saturday&#8217;s performances, I&#8217;d have Rachel and Ashley in the bottom two. Rachel because with a very &#8216;light and easy&#8217; song, she managed to crack at the top note - and no, John, it wasn&#8217;t because of emotions, it was trying so very hard to impress that she can reach the note. Ashley because I felt those come-hither looks she gave during her performance were shallow. But Ashley survived and it was Sarah who couldn&#8217;t be saved by Andrew Lloyd Webber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leafy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9229</link>
		<author>Leafy</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9229</guid>
		<description>I tend to agree with much of what Jeanne says. I couldn't understand the bottom 2 at all this week. Although I personally can't warm to Rachel at all (don't know why - I just don't like watching her) I didn't think she deserved the sing-off. And Sarah! What's going on? She had one of the best voices. I think her song was totally wrong for her and was the main reason she went out. She did her best with it but it was a rotten choice for a woman. I would have had Niamh in there - she looks totally wrong for Nancy. Thought Ashley did a good job but I fear she's next to go. Jessie has been my fave from the beginning. As for the Olivers, I had my eye on Harry from the start so pleased he's through. Gwion is cute, but that strong Welsh accent!! It's cute but will he be able to tone it down for the stage? I also like Arthur and Jordan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to agree with much of what Jeanne says. I couldn&#8217;t understand the bottom 2 at all this week. Although I personally can&#8217;t warm to Rachel at all (don&#8217;t know why - I just don&#8217;t like watching her) I didn&#8217;t think she deserved the sing-off. And Sarah! What&#8217;s going on? She had one of the best voices. I think her song was totally wrong for her and was the main reason she went out. She did her best with it but it was a rotten choice for a woman. I would have had Niamh in there - she looks totally wrong for Nancy. Thought Ashley did a good job but I fear she&#8217;s next to go. Jessie has been my fave from the beginning. As for the Olivers, I had my eye on Harry from the start so pleased he&#8217;s through. Gwion is cute, but that strong Welsh accent!! It&#8217;s cute but will he be able to tone it down for the stage? I also like Arthur and Jordan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingathon27</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9181</link>
		<author>kingathon27</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9181</guid>
		<description>Well Rachel was appalling on Saturday-she was out of tune and even screeched on a top note-imagine if she had done that on the West End stage she would have been a laughing stock.  Although Niamh was pretty bad too....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Rachel was appalling on Saturday-she was out of tune and even screeched on a top note-imagine if she had done that on the West End stage she would have been a laughing stock.  Although Niamh was pretty bad too&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colouredlights</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9023</link>
		<author>colouredlights</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-9023</guid>
		<description>I am thoroughly confused - how did Rachel end up in the bottom 2, whilst Niamh wasn't? Sarah must be pretty frustrated - I think she would have been saved in a sing-off against almost anyone else apart from Rachel... 

Jon (http://colouredlights.wordpress.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thoroughly confused - how did Rachel end up in the bottom 2, whilst Niamh wasn&#8217;t? Sarah must be pretty frustrated - I think she would have been saved in a sing-off against almost anyone else apart from Rachel&#8230; </p>
<p>Jon (http://colouredlights.wordpress.com)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8994</link>
		<author>Jeanne</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 12:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8994</guid>
		<description>I only joined this show part way through, but here are my views:

Firstly, the format boggles me -

Why has the casting vote been given to someone who has no involvement with the show?  I can’t imagine a producer/director relinquishing the casting of a major part to someone indifferent.  I find ALW very creepy; he makes me think of a child molester. He always seems to be available when an over-emotional Nancy candidate has an urge to hurl herself into someone’s arms.  He sits on that throne like a malevolent toad.

At first I thought DVO had been put on the panel as a bit of fluff; but her comments are very intelligent and insightful – she definitely knows what she’s talking about.  Whereas “Captain Jack” just makes a lot of noise.

I find the format quite repetitive; there is far more to playing a leading lady than singing pop songs.  All the girls have obviously got fantastic voices, or else they wouldn’t have got this far.  I feel they need to be tested more on their acting outside of the songs, and more needs to be said about how they actually move on stage.  I would have liked to have seen the show focus on the ‘pub challenge’, and for the voting to have been given based on their individual performances. Even at this late stage we don’t know how good the girls’ cockney accents are!

I would also like to see more interaction with the Olivers.  It surprises me that we have not yet seen a Nancy and an Oliver give a joint performance.  You could have the perfect Nancy and the perfect Oliver but if they don’t work well together then the show suffers.  Next week I think all the girls should get a chance to perform with the boys.

I did feel that Samantha had an unfair advantage this week, as she was given dance moves to add an extra dimension to her performance.  She did very well, but I would have liked to have seen how all 7 coped with choreographed movement.  

My favourite is Jodie (although I doubt she’ll win).  She has vocal strength, energy and depth.  She can be tough or vulnerable – I could see her throwing a grown man out of a bar, and I could see her sitting down and weeping.  She is feisty, but also fun.

Here’s my thoughts on the others:

Rachael – Shouts too much.  No element of fun or optimism. Oliver! would be pretty grim if she were cast.
Naimh – What is she still doing here????  Beautiful voice, but no character.  Boring to watch.
Jessie – A strong contender for me.
Ashley – At first I thought she had potential and I wanted her to do well, but she is lacking something.
Samantha – Not really seen much acting from her, apart from doing sexy moves.  Perhaps she could be a stripper or something…</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only joined this show part way through, but here are my views:</p>
<p>Firstly, the format boggles me -</p>
<p>Why has the casting vote been given to someone who has no involvement with the show?  I can’t imagine a producer/director relinquishing the casting of a major part to someone indifferent.  I find ALW very creepy; he makes me think of a child molester. He always seems to be available when an over-emotional Nancy candidate has an urge to hurl herself into someone’s arms.  He sits on that throne like a malevolent toad.</p>
<p>At first I thought DVO had been put on the panel as a bit of fluff; but her comments are very intelligent and insightful – she definitely knows what she’s talking about.  Whereas “Captain Jack” just makes a lot of noise.</p>
<p>I find the format quite repetitive; there is far more to playing a leading lady than singing pop songs.  All the girls have obviously got fantastic voices, or else they wouldn’t have got this far.  I feel they need to be tested more on their acting outside of the songs, and more needs to be said about how they actually move on stage.  I would have liked to have seen the show focus on the ‘pub challenge’, and for the voting to have been given based on their individual performances. Even at this late stage we don’t know how good the girls’ cockney accents are!</p>
<p>I would also like to see more interaction with the Olivers.  It surprises me that we have not yet seen a Nancy and an Oliver give a joint performance.  You could have the perfect Nancy and the perfect Oliver but if they don’t work well together then the show suffers.  Next week I think all the girls should get a chance to perform with the boys.</p>
<p>I did feel that Samantha had an unfair advantage this week, as she was given dance moves to add an extra dimension to her performance.  She did very well, but I would have liked to have seen how all 7 coped with choreographed movement.  </p>
<p>My favourite is Jodie (although I doubt she’ll win).  She has vocal strength, energy and depth.  She can be tough or vulnerable – I could see her throwing a grown man out of a bar, and I could see her sitting down and weeping.  She is feisty, but also fun.</p>
<p>Here’s my thoughts on the others:</p>
<p>Rachael – Shouts too much.  No element of fun or optimism. Oliver! would be pretty grim if she were cast.<br />
Naimh – What is she still doing here????  Beautiful voice, but no character.  Boring to watch.<br />
Jessie – A strong contender for me.<br />
Ashley – At first I thought she had potential and I wanted her to do well, but she is lacking something.<br />
Samantha – Not really seen much acting from her, apart from doing sexy moves.  Perhaps she could be a stripper or something…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingathon27</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8878</link>
		<author>kingathon27</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>Yeah I have lol! Chester is brilliant and Gwion is also very very good other than that I would say they're all rather similar and not all that great....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I have lol! Chester is brilliant and Gwion is also very very good other than that I would say they&#8217;re all rather similar and not all that great&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy c</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8875</link>
		<author>andy c</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 20:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8875</guid>
		<description>Anyone got anything to say about the Olivers?
A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone got anything to say about the Olivers?<br />
A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingathon27</title>
		<link>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8870</link>
		<author>kingathon27</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 19:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.whatsonstage.com/2008/05/04/results-the-curveball/#comment-8870</guid>
		<description>Totally happy with the night's results.  Delighted that the wonderfully talented Ashley was put through and against the grain of comments.  Equally delighted that despite heaping praise on her Rachel was in the bottom two, as her performance was a DISASTER! But in the end she clearly has more Nancy-like qualities than Sarah, who I would say has the best voice out of all the Nancys, but not suited at all to the role.  Also her final performance proved that she couldn't be Nancy-it was good, but not Nancy.  GOOD RESULT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally happy with the night&#8217;s results.  Delighted that the wonderfully talented Ashley was put through and against the grain of comments.  Equally delighted that despite heaping praise on her Rachel was in the bottom two, as her performance was a DISASTER! But in the end she clearly has more Nancy-like qualities than Sarah, who I would say has the best voice out of all the Nancys, but not suited at all to the role.  Also her final performance proved that she couldn&#8217;t be Nancy-it was good, but not Nancy.  GOOD RESULT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
